Early versions of the bag were busy.
Not obviously broken.
Just trying too hard.
We removed features that existed to reassure, not to help. Extra pockets that fragmented attention. Redundant access points that promised speed but added decisions. Structure that looked strong but worked against the body.
Some removals were obvious. Others were uncomfortable. A few survived longer than they should have because they felt “expected.”
Expectation is a poor design reason.
We also removed complexity from how the bag is used. Fewer compartments. Clearer load paths. Less re-organisation mid-journey. The goal wasn’t minimalism—it was inevitability. The feeling that there’s only one sensible way to use it.
What remains isn’t final. There are still elements under review. If something needs explaining, it’s on borrowed time.
If you notice something that feels like it doesn’t belong, tell us. The mailing list is where we share what’s being questioned next—and what quietly disappears.
Removal is the work.
Everything else is noise.
Leave a Reply